 biogenesis is the field of science
 dedicated to studying how life might have arisen for the first time
 on the primordial young Earth. Despite the enormous progress that has
 been made since the Miller-Urey experiment, abiogenesis is under
 constant attack from creationists, who continually claim that the origin
 of life by natural processes is so unlikely as to be, for all
 practical purposes, impossible. Following are some articles that
 challenge this claim and demonstrate the fundamental misconception
 at the core of the creationists' arguments.
biogenesis is the field of science
 dedicated to studying how life might have arisen for the first time
 on the primordial young Earth. Despite the enormous progress that has
 been made since the Miller-Urey experiment, abiogenesis is under
 constant attack from creationists, who continually claim that the origin
 of life by natural processes is so unlikely as to be, for all
 practical purposes, impossible. Following are some articles that
 challenge this claim and demonstrate the fundamental misconception
 at the core of the creationists' arguments.
 
  - 
   
    Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and Probability of Abiogenesis Calculations
  
- 
	How likely is it that even a single bacterium could form by chance
	in the primordial sea? Not very likely, that's for sure, and creationists have been
	only too happy to provide ludicrously huge numbers purporting to be the odds
	against such a thing. However, even if these calculations are correct, they
	are irrelevant, as modern theories of abiogenesis require nothing of the kind
	to happen. This article briefly	illustrates what abiogenesis really is 
	and shows why the creationists' probability calculations do not matter.
   
 
 
- 
   
    Borel's Law and the Origin of Many Creationist Probability Assertions
  
- 
	Creationists have asserted that a statistical principle called "Borel's Law"
	mathematically demonstrates that abiogenesis is impossible. This article
	explains what Borel's Law is and shows that Borel himself clearly understood
	that his law was not relevant to the probability of the origin of life.
   
 
 
- 
	 Spontaneous Generation and the 
	 Origin of Life
  
- 
	 Creationists often claim that Louis Pasteur disproved spontaneous generation 
	 and hence any naturalistic origin of life.  This article shows what Pasteur 
	 really demonstrated and gives a history of the subject from early ideas of 
	 spontaneous generation to modern ideas about the origin of life.
	 
 
 
- 
	 The Origin of Life
	
- 
	  A discussion of the main models on the spontaneous origin of life
    that aims to show how cellular complexity could have gradually emerged
    from simple systems - in contrast to the sudden appearance of
    complexity that creationists claim to have been necessary at the
    beginning of life. Central issues like the composition of the early
    atmosphere of the Earth and the origin of the homochirality of amino
    acids and sugars are reviewed as well.
 
 
- 
	 
	  Review of the Miller-Urey experiment chapter of Icons of Evolution
  
- 
	  Jonathan Wells of the Discovery Institute has made false claims
		about abiogenesis research in his
		book Icons of Evolution.
 
 
- 
	  An Index to Creationist Claims: Abiogenesis
	
- 
	  Brief replies to various origin-of-life claims by antievolutionists.
 
 
     
		
    
    