Browse Search Feedback Other Links Home Home The Talk.Origins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy

Index to Creationist Claims,  edited by Mark Isaak,    Copyright © 2004
Previous Claim: CC401   |   List of Claims   |   Next Claim: CD002

Claim CD001:

Radiometric dating falsely assumes that the rocks being dated are closed systems. It inappropriately assumes that no parent or daughter isotopes were added or removed via other processes through the history of the sample.

Source:

Morris, Henry M., 1974. Scientific Creationism, Green Forest, AR: Master Books, p. 139.

Response:

  1. Absolutely closed systems do not exist even under ideal laboratory conditions. Nevertheless, many rocks approximate closed systems so closely that multiple radiometric dating methods produce consistent results, within 1 percent of each other.

  2. Some rocks may be open to outside contamination, but not all of them are. Most ages are determined from multiple mineral and rock samples, which give a consistent date within 1 and 3 percent. It is extremely unlikely that contamination would affect all samples by the same amount.

  3. Isochron methods can detect contamination and, to some extent, correct for it. Isochrons are determined from multiple samples, and contamination would have to affect all of the samples the same way in order to create an isochron that appeared okay but was wrong (see CD002).

    With uranium-lead dating, closure of the system may be tested with a concordia diagram. This takes advantage of the fact that there are two isotopes of uranium (238U and 235U) that decay to different isotopes of lead (206Pb and 207Pb, respectively). If the system has remained closed, then a plot of 206Pb / 238U versus 207Pb / 235U will fall on a known line called the concordia. Even if samples are discordant, reliable dates can often be derived (Faure 1998, 287-290).

  4. Geochronologists are well aware of the dangers of contamination, and they take pains to minimize it. For example, they do not use weathered samples.

Links:

Jessey, David, n.d. Isotope geochemistry. http://geology.csupomona.edu/drjessey/class/gsc300/isotope1.pdf

Stassen, Chris, 1998. Isochron dating. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/isochron-dating.html

References:

  1. Faure, Gunter, 1998. Principles and Applications of Geochemistry, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Further Reading:

Dalrymple, G. Brent, 1991. The Age of the Earth, Stanford University Press. (Contains an understandable explanation of isochron methods.)

Dickin, Alan P., 1995. Radiogenic Isotope Geology, Cambridge University Press.

Faure, Gunter, 1986. Principles of Isotope Geology, 2nd Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons. (This and Dickin 1995 are standard texts.)
Previous Claim: CC401   |   List of Claims   |   Next Claim: CD002

created 2003-5-2, modified 2004-9-2