Warning: this page discusses the plot of Operation Adam in detail, so you might want to skip it if you intend to read the book. The book is currently available only in French.
It turns out that the Protectors of Adam were also responsible for the Piltdown Man hoax, an unsuccessful attempt to destroy the Heidelberg Man jaw during World War II, and the disappearance of the Peking Man fossils during World War II.
Clues lead the searchers to a hiding place in Zion National Park where all the fossils are discovered unharmed, along with the long-lost Peking Man fossils.
A third "Monkey Trial" is held the following year (the first two being the 1925 Scopes Trial and the 1981 Arkansas Trial). For reasons that are not made clear, the court does not even attempt to determine whether the defendants are guilty of the crime or not. Instead, the entire case is devoted to arguing the merits of creation vs. evolution. The prosecution and defense debate the major topics of the creationism/evolution debate, such as the fossil record, human evolution, the Flood and Noah's Ark, radiometric dating, and the origin of life.
Samuel Lev testifies during the trial. During his convalescence, he has abandoned creationism, and now apologizes for his actions.
During the trial, there are threats of violence from creationist supporters, and eventually a newspaper reporter who has been critical of creationism is abducted and seriously wounded by being crucified on a saguaro cactus.
The jury returns a decision which finds all the defendants guilty and sentences them according to their complicity, with jail terms ranging from 10 years for the major perpetrators to short suspended sentences. They also rule that the words "scientific creationism" can not be used together.
Far less plausible - indeed, totally implausible - is the ease with which the fossils are stolen. The entire collection of skulls would be priceless and irreplaceable, but I would estimate that their insurance value would be many tens of millions of dollars. So should such an exhibit ever occur, we can be quite sure that security will be far, far, tighter than is the case in this book, in which a single student is left in charge of the entire collection overnight.
And no matter how oxymoronic the term "creation science" is, I find it impossible to imagine any American court ever forbidding its use even by a convicted defendant, let alone in the community at large, as happens in this book. Such a judgement seems in blatant contradiction to the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guaranteeing freedom of speech.
Finally, I believe this book portrays creationists as more violent and racist than is justified. Creationists are fond of trying to smear evolution with the taint of racism (and evolutionary thinking was often misused to justify racism in the past), but nowadays it seems many racists are aggressively Christian, and even creationist. Nevertheless, although many racists may be creationists, the reverse is not true, and the creationist movement is not racist to any significant degree.
This is not, and is not meant to be, an even-handed book (not that that's a bad thing; creation science books are not noted for their balance either). The creationists are portrayed unsympathetically, and during the trial are continually outwitted, outdebated, and reduced to silence by the arguments of their opponents. If only real creationists were so readily corrected.
See the entry for this book at www.amazon.fr
Return to the Paleoanthropological Fiction page.
This page is part of the Fossil Hominids FAQ at the talk.origins Archive.
Home Page |
Illustrations | What's New | Feedback | Search | Links | Fiction
Copyright © Jim Foley || Email me