Subject: | Re: Request Date: | 4 August 2005 Message-ID: | NailedIt@demKBykoL
John Harshman wrote:
> > I will post the sequences in this thread, five posts, one set of
> > nucleotides per post. I'll leave the subject line untouched. The
> > first line of each post should read SAMPLE A1, SAMPLE A2, ....
> > SAMPLE A5. A blank line will follow, then the nucleotides, there
> > should be nothing else in the posts. I've also trimmed the numbering
> > on the left side, I was afraid it was getting close to wrapping in
> > some news readers. There is one each of
> > Homo sapiens
> > Pan troglodytes
> > Gorilla gorilla
> > Pongo pygmaeus
> > Hylobates klossii
> > There is no significance to the sequential scheme A1,A2,A3,A4,A5 and
> > I've intentionally mixed them up so there would not be.
> OK, here are my identifications:
> A3 = Hylobates
> A5 = Pongo
> A1 = Gorilla
> A2, A4 = Homo and Pan
A2 is Homo, A4 is Pan.
I also had Pan paniscus, I think you would have lock down two Pan representatives with absolute certainty if I had added it to the mix, but of course there would have been no way to distinguish between Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus.
Thanks for the effort, I find this to have been a noteworthy exercise.
> Like I said, the first two are easy, the third less clear. And the last
> two are interchangeable; there's no possible way to tell them apart just
> by the shape of the tree.
> Here's how I did this:
> First I had to massage slightly to put it into analyzable form using the
> program PAUP. I put all the sequences in one text file. I put a _
> between SAMPLE and A1, etc., because PAUP recognizes names as everything
> before the first space. I added this to the beginning of the file:
> BEGIN DATA;
> DIMENSIONS NTAX=5 NCHAR=1002;
> FORMAT DATATYPE=DNA ;
> The first line reassures PAUP that the file is in its standard format.
> The next lines identify a NEXUS data block, tell the program the number
> of species and characters, and inform it that the data are DNA. The last
> line tells it that the actual data are starting.
> Then I added this to the end:
> Those two lines tell the program that the data are ending, and that the
> DATA block is ending.
> Then I executed the file in PAUP, which means that I loaded the data
> into the program memory, and then did one of the simplest analyses,
> neighbor joining. Other methods gave me the same tree. Here's the tree:
> Neighbor-joining tree:
> /------- SAMPLE A1 > | /--------------------------- SAMPLE A2 > | /--+------------- SAMPLE A4 > \-+ /--------------------[...]------------------- SAMPLE A3 > \--------------+------------------------- SAMPLE A5> I had to shorten the branch to A3 so it would fit on this page; that's
No, a taste receptor gene. Take note that the Homo entry says "candidate taste receptor TAS2R38" all the others say "taste receptor type 2 member 38".
[Return to the 2005 Posts of the Month]
Home Page |
The FAQ | Must-Read Files | Index | Creationism | Evolution | Age of the Earth | Flood Geology | Catastrophism | Debates